Oh my, we're jumping back to DISTORTION, for a bit, and looking at what happens when you push a signal up, run it out of headroom, and generate harmonic distortion.
Isn't it cool that, if you've been following these series of posts, you can now understand everything I just wrote? It's also cool if you already knew all this stuff. Everything is cool. Even distortion is cool... if it sounds good.
You may have read, or heard, engineers say things like: "Compression is distortion, distortion is compression, saturation is distortion, saturation is compression yada yada yada" and now all of these terms are mixed in your head and it's confusing. So, let's straighten this out and give you some mental tools so you can get this crap under control.
DISTORTION and COMPRESSION
As you know (and if you don't, go here), as we crank up the signal through a piece of gear and run it out of headroom, the gear loses its ability to reproduce the signal and the wave clips. That is, the peaks of it - the waves that are very high in power - are rounded off a bit. And if you're knocking off the high peaks of a signal, you are compressing the dynamic range of the signal. So, a side product of pushing a signal into the distortion point is some compression.
You've probably heard this whenever someone overdrives up a guitar amp. You'll notice that there's not a lot of volume difference between the softly played parts and the loudly played parts. Contrast that to a guitar amp that isn't overdriven: the quiet parts can be very quiet, and the loud parts really loud. Try this with a Fender Twin - you'll hear the loudest, utterly painful clear guitar parts, and you'll have to squint for the quiet stuff.
Compression occurs early on, as you use up headroom, and it doesn't necessarily generate that much harmonic distortion. It will produce some, but it might be inaudible at first.
DISTORTION is NOT a COMPRESSOR
So, there is a compression of dynamic range when you have distortion, but it isn't the same type of compression that you typically get from a dedicated compressor.
Typically, a compressor has a bit of lag from when it senses a signal over threshold to when the gain reduction circuit kicks in. That lag is called "Attack Time", and sometimes it's fixed, sometimes it's adjustable, sometimes it's short, sometimes it's long, but in any event, that "lag" is pretty much the reason why a compressor sounds punchy: it lets the transient get through... the transient "punches" through - is a good way to remember this.
But when you slam a signal into a tube, or a FET, or into analog tape, and cause clipping, there is no lag. The transient doesn't get through, it is immediately squashed at the speed of not enough electrons. There's also a very fast release when you're getting this sort of effect.
So, this type of compression is very different from that caused by a compressor. It can be very useful, actually, and you're very used to hearing it, especially on records from the '50s, '60s and '70s.
Saturation is a term that describes a physical phenomena: if you record very hot to tape, the magnetic particles can't move any further, and that is called "tape saturation". Think back to 8th grade science class and making "saturated solutions" with that asshole Mr Frank, who always favored the lacrosse players over nerdy fucking musicians like me. Uh... I digress.
Saturation is also what happens to transformers, when a lot of signal is pushed through them and they become "saturated”. Here’s a topic for another post, I guess.
If compression is what happens, as we start pushing a signal into clipping, saturation is what happens if we keep going: the signal gets squashed a bit more, and Harmonic Distortion starts to increase.
Increasing harmonic distortion adds upper harmonics, so, a signal moving into saturation tends to get brighter, and the more you push in, the brighter it gets. And this is the big use of saturation and "saturators" these days, to make things a bit more present by adding brightness and... COMPRESSION, right? Because using up headroom and generating harmonic distortion adds compression. But not "compressor compression", right? It adds compression that's not punchie.
If you keep increasing the level, you'll keep increasing harmonic distortion, and eventually your ear will recognize things as sounding distorted. There isn't some spot where audio engineers agree: "Oh, that's gone from saturation to distortion". A classical engineer will hear ANY compression and saturation and call it distortion, whereas someone using saturator plug-ins might be drawing lines here or there. Someone like me, an old school analog engineer, will probably just record stuff and get it to where they think it should be and not give a squirrel's ass about what it's called.
In other words, the words are arbitrary. What's happening is this: as you turn things up, you reduce the dynamic range and add upper harmonics. That's what it all is.
WHEN DO YOU USE THIS STUFF?
All the time, I guess. I usually pushed drums into analog tape, while recording, to tame the attacks a little bit and "lengthen" the hits (more on that later). I would, typically, cut the kick kinda on the lower side, because I wanted as much of the punch of that thing as possible, but snare I would usually smush in quite a bit, and cymbals too. Hi hats... if I wanted them crisp - meaning lots of nice ticky ticky transients - then I would cut them on the low side. If I wanted to make them more sloppy (squash the transient a bit) then I would:
a) cut them higher
b) cut them lower
If you answered a), you understand tape compression.
A basic way to think of using saturation/tape compression (or whatever this sort of thing might be called) is: Do I need this instrument to sound brighter? Do I need more punch out of it? Is it too punchy?
Realize that making it brighter, by generating more distortion, will typically nip off transients a bit. You're going to notice the loss of transients on faster things, not so much on slower things like vocals or guitars. As I wrote in last week's blog post, I used to always smush guitars into tape, and that was usually done to get rid of some of the transient activity, so things weren't so pingy and whistle-like (the Insufferable Midrange Filter on the AIP hadn't yet been invented).
And that is it for this week. I had hoped to make you all a video, but my tinnitus is bad this week so it wasn’t meant to be.
Yes, I have tinnitus. I got it years ago, from a week of sessions that was a little too long and a little too loud.
Tinnitus, if you’re in audio, is a bit like getting in a car accident while driving. You might be very careful, and take all precautions, and you can still get hit. If you’re on the road, you can get hit. Honestly, with tinnitus, you can be miles from the road up in the mountains and suddenly a car can drop out of the sky on your fucking head.
Someday I’ll write a bunch of things on tinnitus, but for now I’ll say this:
1) Wear hearing protection around drum sets, horn sections, PA systems and guitar stacks. And on subway trains.
2) Don’t go to ANY live gigs without hearing protection. It could be a concert of ants picking their noses. If it’s being mic’d, it’s too loud.
3) Get an SPL meter app for your phone and measure your environment. Note whenever you’re in a place that gets consistently above 80dB-SPL. Try to avoid those places, and if you’re stuck in one of them, leave as soon as you can - like within an hour. If it is louder, leave sooner. If it is above 100 dB-SPL, question why you are there in the first place.
4) Avoid earbuds like the plague. Never wear them on a train or in a car. This is like playing Russian roulette with a lawn mower.
If you have tinnitus... I feel ya. Most likely it isn’t your fault, and beating yourself up won’t help. Feel free to write me - Luke @ Korneff Audio dot com. Remove the spaces and make the dot a dot. You’re not alone and there are some things you can do so life doesn’t suck.